Skip to main content

Table 2 Assessment of quality and reliability of the individual studies

From: Endotracheal intubation to reduce aspiration events in acutely comatose patients: a systematic review

Study

Section A: Are the results of the study valid?

Section B: What are the results?

Section C: Will the results help locally?

Did the study address a focused issue?

Was the cohort recruited acceptably?

Was the exposure accurately measured to minimize bias?

Was the outcome accurately measured to minimize bias?

Have the authors identified all-important confounding factors?

Was the follow up of subjects complete enough?

Have ethical issues been taken into consideration?

Was the data analysis sufficiently rigorous?

Is there a clear statement of findings?

How valuable is the research?

Non-traumatic patients

Donald [16] 2009

Yes

Yes

Uncertain

Yes

Uncertain

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

High

Duncan [8] 2009

Yes

Yes

Uncertain

Yes

Uncertain

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

High

Eizadi-Mood [17] 2009

Yes

Uncertain

Uncertain

Uncertain

Uncertain

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Moderate

Montassier [18] 2012

Yes

Yes

Uncertain

No

Uncertain

Uncertain

Uncertain

Uncertain

Yes

Low

Nielsen6 2012

Yes

Yes

Uncertain

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Low

Dietze [19] 2014

Yes

Uncertain

Uncertain

Yes

Uncertain

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Low

Van Helmond [20]

2019

Yes

Yes

Uncertain

Yes

Uncertain

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Moderate

Trauma patients

Davis [21] 2005

Yes

Yes

Uncertain

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Uncertain

Moderate

Irvin [11] 2010

Yes

Uncertain

Uncertain

Uncertain

Uncertain

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Moderate

Evans [22] 2011

Yes

Uncertain

Uncertain

Yes

Uncertain

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Moderate

Emami [23] 2019

Yes

Uncertain

Uncertain

Yes

Uncertain

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Moderate

Adult Mixed cases

Steuerwald [24] 2018

Yes

Uncertain

Uncertain

Yes

Uncertain

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Moderate

Pediatric Mixed cases

Tweed [12] 2018

Uncertain

Uncertain

No

Uncertain

Uncertain

Yes

Yes

Uncertain

Yes

Low