From: Can performance indicators be used for pedagogic purposes in disaster medicine training?
Indicators | Explanation and comments |
---|---|
1. Design | 0 = No clear design |
1 = Clearly described too small or too extensive | |
2 = Good | |
2. Running simulation | 0 = No enthusiasm |
1 = Enthusiastic but not with control | |
2 = Enthusiastic and in control | |
3. Aim | 0 = Unclear |
1 = Clear but not patient related | |
2 = Clear and patient related | |
4. Goal | 0 = Not relevant |
1 = Relevant but not understandable | |
2 = Relevant and understandable | |
5. Objectives | 0 = Not stated |
1 = Stated but not measurable | |
2 = Stated and measurable | |
6. Performance indicators | 0 = Not realistic |
1 = Realistic but no challenge | |
2 = Realistic and challengeable | |
7. Target level | 0 = Not defined |
1 = Defined but not followed | |
2 = Defined and followed | |
8. Target group | 0 = Not defined |
1 = Defined but not adopted to | |
2 = Defined and adopted to | |
9. Interventions | 0 = No or unclear purpose of interventions |
1 = Clear purpose, poorly executed and/or followed up | |
2 = Clear purpose, good executed and followed up | |
10. Time-out | 0 = No start or no stop |
1 = Start and stop no purpose | |
2 = Start/Stop/Purpose | |
11. Evaluation | 0 = Not using performance indicators (p.i.) |
1 = Using p.i. Not precise enough | |
2 = Using p.i Being specific | |
12. Feedback | 0 = No feed back |
1 = No suggestions on how to improve | |
2 = Good feed back, good suggestions | |
13. Overall impression | 0 = |
1 = | |
2 = |