Skip to main content

Table 1 Proposed performance indicators used in this study, evaluation criteria and points

From: Can performance indicators be used for pedagogic purposes in disaster medicine training?

Indicators

Explanation and comments

1. Design

0 = No clear design

 

1 = Clearly described too small or too extensive

 

2 = Good

2. Running simulation

0 = No enthusiasm

 

1 = Enthusiastic but not with control

 

2 = Enthusiastic and in control

3. Aim

0 = Unclear

 

1 = Clear but not patient related

 

2 = Clear and patient related

4. Goal

0 = Not relevant

 

1 = Relevant but not understandable

 

2 = Relevant and understandable

5. Objectives

0 = Not stated

 

1 = Stated but not measurable

 

2 = Stated and measurable

6. Performance indicators

0 = Not realistic

 

1 = Realistic but no challenge

 

2 = Realistic and challengeable

7. Target level

0 = Not defined

 

1 = Defined but not followed

 

2 = Defined and followed

8. Target group

0 = Not defined

 

1 = Defined but not adopted to

 

2 = Defined and adopted to

9. Interventions

0 = No or unclear purpose of interventions

 

1 = Clear purpose, poorly executed and/or followed up

 

2 = Clear purpose, good executed and followed up

10. Time-out

0 = No start or no stop

 

1 = Start and stop no purpose

 

2 = Start/Stop/Purpose

11. Evaluation

0 = Not using performance indicators (p.i.)

 

1 = Using p.i. Not precise enough

 

2 = Using p.i Being specific

12. Feedback

0 = No feed back

 

1 = No suggestions on how to improve

 

2 = Good feed back, good suggestions

13. Overall impression

0 =

 

1 =

 

2 =